Siong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 1030 · 2004
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Krasnopivtsev v. Ashcroft (2004), Ray v. Gonzales (2006)
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Iturribarria v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · LOZADA · Kalaw v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Cano-Merida v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]rejudice is found when the performance of counsel was so inadequate that it may have affected the outcome of the proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Gonzales · Ray v. Gonzales“the BIA could plausibly have held that [Ray] was [eligible for relief] based on the record before it,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Gonzales · Ray v. Gonzales“more properly characterized as a motion to reconsider.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Gonzales · Ray v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.