Village of Bensenville v. Federal Aviation Administration’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 1114 · 2004
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 49 U.S.C. § 40101 (Air Traffic Management System Performance Improvement Act of 1996) · 49 U.S.C. § 40117 · 49 U.S.C. § 46110 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Califano v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the doctrine’s first prong, we look to see whether the issue is purely legal, whether consideration of the issue would benefit from a more concrete setting, and whether the agency's action is sufficiently final.” Village of Bensenville v. F.A.A., 376 F.3d 1114, 1120 (D.C.Cir.2004) (citations omitted). Under the second prong, the court considers”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not whether [the parties] have suffered any `direct hardship,' but rather whether postponing judicial review would impose an undue burden on them or would benefit the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“We do not ordinarily consider agency reasoning that `appears nowhere in the [agency's] order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.