United States v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 1160 · 2004
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Koon v. United States · Dobbert v. Florida · Collins v. Youngblood · Williams v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a set of typical cases embodying the conduct that each guideline describes. When a court finds an atypical case, one to which a particular guideline linguistically applies but where conduct significantly differs from the norm, the court may consider whether a departure is warranted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Employment record is not ordinarily relevant in determining whether a sentence should be outside the applicable guideline range.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with immediate effect, and without constitutional disability, to appellate proceedings after April 30, 2003.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.