Rusz v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 1182 · 2004
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2021
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · United States v. Corona-Sanchez · Tokatly v. Ashcroft · Cedano-Viera v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a crime for which a sentence of one year or longer may be imposed”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]entence enhancements ... do not describe substantive criminal offenses ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any final order of removal against an alien who is removable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mairena v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.