Palmer v. Braun’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 1254 · 2004
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Litecubes, LLC v. Northern Light Products, Inc. (2008), Stubbs v. Wyndham Nassau Resort and Crystal Palace Casino Whc US (2006)
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400
Relies on Jackson v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad · Davis v. Hill Engineering, Inc. · Robinson v. Giarmarco & Bill, P.C. · Update Art, Inc. v. Modiin Publishing, Ltd. · Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“federal copyright law has no extraterritorial effect, and cannot be invoked to secure relief for acts of infringement occurring outside the United States”) (citations omitted). 8 . For example, Coca-Cola need not credit Vergara in television advertisements unless Coca-Cola typically credits a composer in a commercial or unless the composer of the English lyrics is credited as such, while Coca-Cola would need to credit Vergara when”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t is well-settled that lack of personal jurisdiction is a waivable defect, and that a defendant waives any objection to the district court's jurisdiction over his person by not objecting to it in a responsive pleading or a [motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“motion clearly raised only venue, and not personal jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.