Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 F.3d 1292 - National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, St. Johns Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners

National Alliance for the Mentally Ill, St. Johns Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners’s Empirical Analysis

376 F.3d 1292 · 2004

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2020

4 federal appellate ·

140200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Singleton v. Wulff · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court has warned litigants that "failure to comply with Rule 28(a)(9)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure may result in waiver or abandonment of issues on appeal.” Because [the plaintiffs-appellants] have not satisfied Rule 28(a)(9)(A), the Court deems them to have waived any claim concerning their individual standing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) that it has suffered an ‘injury in fact’ that is concrete and particularized, (2) that the injury is ‘fairly traceable’ to the actions of the defendant, and (3) that the injury will likely be redressed by a favorable decision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.