Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 F.3d 23 - In Re Citigroup, Inc.

In Re Citigroup, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2021

6 district ·

50200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Hoxworth · Restoration Preservation Masonry, Inc. v. Grove Europe Ltd. · Jones Motor Company Inc v. Chauffeurs Teamsters and Helpers Local Union No of New Hampshire · Menorah Insurance Company Ltd v. Inx Reinsurance Corporation Menorah Insurance Company Ltd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hether the party has actually participated in the lawsuit or has taken other action inconsistent with his right, ... whether the litigation machinery has been substantially invoked and the parties were well into preparation of a lawsuit by the time an intention to arbitrate was communicated by the defendant to the plaintiff, ... whether there has been a long delay in seeking a stay or whether the enforcement of arbitration was brought up when the trial was near at hand.... Other relevant factors are whether the defendants have invoked the jurisdiction of the court by filing a counterclaim without asking for a stay of the proceedings, ... whether important intervening steps (e.g., taking advantage of judicial discovery procedures not available in arbitration ...) had taken place, ... and whether the other party was affected, misled, or prejudiced by the delay....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When determining whether a defendant prejudicially failed to invoke arbitration in a timely manner, [courts] consider the larger context of the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Prejudice is relevant to waiver when it is the product of a defendant's failure to timely invoke the arbitration procedure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.