Chete Juarez v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 944 · 2004
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Popa v. Holder (2009), Hamoui v. Ashcroft (2004)
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252B (§ 242b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft · Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Services · Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · MONREAL · Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.