Bruce v. Terhune’s Empirical Analysis
376 F.3d 950 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. Taylor · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Lindh v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that a sufficiency of the evidence claim presents a legal determination that must be evaluated through the AEDPA standard of review embodied in § 2254(d)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Garcia v. Carey“the instructions as a whole made clear to the jury that the prosecution bore the burden of proving each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly mandates not a direct application of Jackson, but a deferential review of a state court's application of Jackson.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Garcia v. Carey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.