United States v. Stephens

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 4, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-05-04

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2010

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Lorenzo Deshon Stephens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Stephens, No. 3:06-cr-00281-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.