Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

376 F. App'x 335

Pletz v. Panetta

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-04-30

Decided 2010-04-30

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Debra Pletz appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pletz v. Hayden, No. 1:08-cv-00539-CMH-TCB, 2009 WL 274505 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 4, 2009; entered Feb. 5, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/376/fappx/335 · .json · Public domain