376 F. Supp. 479 - Avard v. Dupuis’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Arnett v. Kennedy · Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · United States v. Seeger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unconstitutionally vague and in contravention of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id. at 483 . The court then excised the offending provision to preserve the immunization program because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.