Washington v. Azar’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 18114 · 42 U.S.C. § 300 · 42 U.S.C. § 300A (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 42 U.S.C. § 300A · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Califano v. Yamasaki · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Rust v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“violates the central purpose of Title X, which is to equalize access to comprehensive, evidence-based, and voluntary family planning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.