Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 Ill. 95 - Finn v. Williams

Finn v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
9
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Horace Case v. Arthur E. Morrisette (1973), Herrera v. Roman Catholic Church (1991)

3 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

17019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trapp v. Gordon · Logan v. Stogsdale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A right of way easement of necessity was necessarily implied in the conveyance severing the two tracts in 1895, and passed by mesne conveyances to plaintiffs in 1937. The fact that the original grantee and his successors in interest have been permitted ingress to and egress from the 40 acres over the land owned by surrounding strangers is immaterial. When such permission is denied, as in the present case, the subsequent grantees may avail themselves of the dormant easement implied in the deed severing the dominant and servient estates.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"Where an owner of land conveys a parcel thereof which has no outlet to a highway except over the remaining lands of the grantor or over the land of strangers, a way by necessity exists over the remaining lands of the grantor.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.