Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 P2D 348 - Webber v. State

Webber v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1979
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Morris · 82 Okla. Crim. 276 - Tillman v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 190 - Eakin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether or not defendant intended to deprive the owner of his car permanently must be determined by the circumstances in each and every case. No one could truthfully say what defendant’s intentions were except by the facts. It would be absurd to expect the defendant to readily admit his intention to deprive the owner of his car permanently.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.