Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 P2D 351 - Carter v. State

Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
11
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 1991 · most notably State v. Mercer (1969), People v. Davis (1965)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1101962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Martin · 82 Okla. Crim. 5 - Bingham v. State · 84 Okla. Crim. 41 - Chapman v. State · Smith v. Commonwealth · 84 Okla. Crim. 176 - Storer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The state of mind of the accused is the proper subject for expert testimony when the defense is based on a plea of insanity at the time of commission of the act, but it is not a proper subject for expert testimony when the defense is not based on a plea of insanity at the time of commission of the act for which the defendant stands accused."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““In a criminal prosecution, any legal evidence from which the jury may adduce guilt or innocence is admissible if, when taken with other evidence in the case, its relevancy appears, and the rejection of competent testimony offered by defendant constitutes prejudicial error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “All persons are capable of committing crimes except those belonging to the following classes: * * * Three—Lunatics and insane persons. * * * Five—Persons who committed the act charged without being conscious thereof. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.