Keck v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably 60 Cal. 2d 355 - Benson v. City of Los Angeles (1963), 65 Cal. 2d 192 - Estate of Baglione (1966)
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McCluskey v. State · 35 Okla. Crim. 414 - Queen v. State · 82 Okla. Crim. 124 - Stroud v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the evidence is conflicting and different inferences may be drawn therefrom, it is the province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts.” Walker v. State, 91 Okl.Cr. 1 , 214 P.2d 961 ; Keck v. State, Okl.Cr., 376 P.2d 525 ; McGowan v. State, Okl.Cr., 380 P.2d 274 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. State““The credibility of the witnesses and the weight and value to be given their testimony is within the exclusive province of the jury to determine, and the jury may believe the evidence of a single witness upon a question of fact and disbelieve several others testifying to the contrary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.