Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 Pa. Super. 416 - Commonwealth v. Scott

376 Pa. Super. 416 - Commonwealth v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably 437 Pa. Super. 258 - Commonwealth v. Berryman (1994), 425 Pa. Super. 24 - Commonwealth v. Bowser (1993)

28 state decisions

2401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Clark · Commonwealth v. Monarch · Commonwealth v. Fisher · 362 Pa. Super. 176 - Commonwealth v. Westcott · Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. Bolger & Picker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(5) attempts to cause or intentionally or knowingly causes bodily injury to a teaching staff member, school board member, other employee or student of any elementary or secondary publicly-funded educational institution, any elementary or secondary private school licensed by the Department of Education or any elementary or secondary parochial school while acting in the scope of his or her employment or because of his or her employment relationship to the school.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Mr. Speaker, this is a vety simple amendment. What it does is it adds the word "student." In the school district of Philadelphia in the sixth district where I live and where my legislative district encompasses, we have a serious problem concerning the fact that a number of people who come from outside the school into the school may not only inflict harm upon any school board employee or a teacher or someone who works for the board would also inflict that same harm upon a student who enters inside the building who is a student of the school. We feel there needs to be some protection to protect the student inside the classroom who attends that school so that he is protected from being beaten upon also inside the school, and I, therefore, Mr. Speaker, ask for an affirmative vote on this amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.