State v. Dingle’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Beard v. Banks · 110 Wash. 2d 528 - State v. Miller · State v. Munoz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As with any statute that is penal in nature, the Court must construe it strictly in favor of the defendant and against the State.”); Hair v. State, 305 S.C. 77, 79 , 406 S.E.2d 332, 334 (1991) (construing in favor of the defendant the different time frames for parole eligibility found in the general parole statute and in a statute regarding parole eligibility for burglary). . The ALC observed that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.