Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

376 So. 2d 1222

Broward County v. Coe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 21, 1979

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1979-11-21

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“). -19- circumstances, upon remand, Nationwide should not be given a second bite at the apple to present evidence which it failed to produce at the scheduled evidentiary hearing. 'Somewhere the curtain must ring down on litigation.'”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including MARLYN TRACEY v. WELLS FARGO BANK N. A., 609 So. 2d 770 - Carlough v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Relies on 281 So. 2d 325 - Dade County School Board v. Dade County Classroom Teachers' Ass'n · 358 So. 2d 214 - Coe v. Broward County · 341 So. 2d 762 - Funchess v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-11-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2019

4 state decisions

2019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge.

¶1This is the third appearance of this class action.1 Following receipt of the opinion and mandate rendered by this court in the second appeal, the trial judge entered a final judgment ordering a rebate of illegally collected taxes according to a plan of rebate. Appellants complain that the trial judge refused to allow appellants an opportunity to submit evidence of good faith in accordance with Gulesian v. Dade County School Board, 281 So.2d 325 (Fla.1973). However, appellants had the opportunity to present evidence on the issue of good faith at the first evidentiary hearing prior to the last appeal. Appellants seek “two bites at the apple.” The trial judge, by entering the final judgment, correctly concluded that this court’s prior opinion neither contemplated nor authorized a second evidentiary hearing. Our prior opinion found that there was no evidence of good faith as required by Gulesian. Ergo, the final judgment of the trial court complied with the decision and mandate of this court. Somewhere the curtain must ring down on litigation.

¶2AFFIRMED.

LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.

¶3. Coe v. Broward County, 327 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), affirmed, 341 So.2d 762 (Fla.1977). Coe v. Broward County, 358 So.2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

/376/so2d/1222 · .json · Public domain