376 So. 2d 340 - Goad v. May’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 370 So. 2d 521 - Lott v. Haley · 368 So. 2d 1134 - Moity v. Busch · Franklin v. Franklin · 347 So. 2d 1204 - Cvitanovich v. Sorli · Lewis Chevrolet Co. v. Whitener
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appeals are favored in our law. We are reluctant to impose the penal provisions of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2164 which provide for the award of damages for frivolous appeal. Such damages will be awarded only when it manifestly appears that the appeal was taken solely for the purpose of delay or that appealing counsel does not seriously believe in the position he advocates, even though the appeal lacks serious merit. Goad v. May, 376 So.2d 340 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1979).””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.