Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 SO2D 446 - Madar v. State

Madar v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Fayerweather v. State · 361 So. 2d 144 - Carroll v. State · 370 So. 2d 1179 - State v. Zimmerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The status of the defendant as being within the class of `worthy organizations' is a threshold question for the application of the Section [849.0931] exception. An individual who is not such a `worthy organization' may not have the benefit of the bingo statutory exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(5) No jackpot shall exceed the value of $250 in actual money or its equivalent, and there shall be no more than three jackpots in any one session of bingo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an organization ... not engaged in efforts of the type set out [in (2)(a)]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.