Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 376 So. 2d 803 - Craig v. State

376 So. 2d 803 - Craig v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miller v. State · 364 So. 2d 397 - Jacks v. State · Garner v. State · 370 So. 2d 323 - Winnings v. State · 370 So. 2d 320 - Andrews v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Corroborative evidence need not directly confirm any particular fact nor go to every material fact stated by the accomplice. Bridges v. State , 52 Ala. App. 546 , 295 So.2d 266 (1974); Dykes v. State , 30 Ala. App. 129 , 1 So.2d 754 (1941). Corroborative evidence need not directly connect the accused with the offense but need only tend to do so. . . . In certain instances, association with the accomplice tending to show the accused's proximity, chronologically and geographically, to the alleged offense may furnish sufficient corroboration.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'A defendant's voluntary confession may . . . be considered corroborative evidence authorizing a conviction. Snoddy v. State , 75 Ala. 23 (1883); Jacks [v. State , 364 So.2d 397 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 364 So.2d 406 (Ala. 1978).]' Craig v. State , 376 So.2d 803 , 806 (Ala.Cr.App. 1979), writ denied, 376 So.2d 807 (Ala. 1979).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"A conviction of felony cannot be had on the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense, and such corroborative evidence, if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof, is not sufficient."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.