Broussard v. Champagne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 28, 1979

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1979-09-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1981

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“"Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, we cannot say the result is incorrect. However, our denial is expressly without prejudice to any rights Mabel Solomon Broussard and Andrew Broussard may have to the property they acquired by deed, they not having been joined in the partition suit on the basis of their capacity as purchasers and they not having been named as defendants. La.C.C. Art. 2286.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 401 So. 2d 1060 - Champagne v. Broussard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In re Mabel Solomon Broussard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Martin. No. 30061.

¶2Writ denied. On the facts found by the court of appeal, we cannot say the result is incorrect. However, our denial is expressly without prejudice to any rights Mabel Solomon Broussard and Andrew Broussard may have to the property they acquired by deed, they not having been joined in the partition suit on the basis of their capacity as purchasers and they not having been named as defendants. La.C.C. Art. 2286.

SUMMERS, C. J. would deny the writ without qualification.