Bextermueller v. Busken’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 2003
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harms v. Simkin · Duncan v. Pinkston · Peter St. Clair v. Hellweg · 204 Mo. App. 55 - Massey v. Butts · 207 Mo. App. 115 - In Re First Nat. Bank of Adrian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendants’ counsel [or appellant’s] had to make an offer of proof in order to perfect his record and to save that matter for presentation upon appeal. It follows that if a trial court can arbitrarily deny to counsel the right to dictate into the record their offer of proof, he can present any consideration upon appeal as to correctness of his own ruling as to the exclusion of certain evidence.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lappin v. Lappin · Nelson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.