Mash v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Taylor v. Louisiana · Purkett v. Elem · Duren v. Missouri
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any act of sexual gratification involving the sex organs of one (1) person and the mouth or anus of another,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Commonwealth“touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. Commonwealth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.