State v. Navdeep S. Brar’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[f]or 'consent' implied by law, we ask whether the driver drove his car.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 192 - State v. Gerald P. Mitchell · State v. Dawn M. Prado

2. “Contrary to Supreme Court precedent, decisions from the court of appeals have required the State to prove consent was given knowingly and intelligently. The Supreme Court in Schneckloth rejected precisely this requirement. As we interpret our constitution consistent with the Fourth Amendment, we withdraw any language from these cases that requires that consent to a search be given knowingly or intelligently.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 384 Wis. 2d 469 - State v. Faith N. Reed

3. “drives or operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state . . . is deemed to have given consent to one or 19 No. 2015AP304-CR more tests of his or her breath, blood or urine, for the purpose of determining the presence or quantity in his or her blood or breath, of [alcohol or other prohibited substances], when requested to do so by a law enforcement officer.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 192 - State v. Gerald P. Mitchell