Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 BR 772 - In Re Saunders

In Re Saunders’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 109 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on In the Matter of Bernard Armstrong, Debtor-Appellant · Otoe County National Bank v. Easton · In Re Reak · Aud v. Van Fossan (In Re Van Fossan) · Matter of Rinker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not less than 50 percent of whose aggregate noncontingent, liquidated debts (excluding a debt for the principal residence of such individual or such individual and spouse unless such debt arises out of a farming operation), on the date the case is filed, arise out of a farming operation owned or operated by such individual or such individual and spouse....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.