Joe Turner v. Charles H. Lundquist’s Empirical Analysis
377 F.2d 44 · 1967
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently December 1999 · most notably Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc. (1969), Vanderboom v. Sexton (1970)
32 federal appellate · 9 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77V (§ 22 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. Wood · Bainbridge v. Stoner · 95 Cal. App. 2d 82 - Sime v. Malouf · Errion v. Connell · 173 Cal. App. 2d 386 - Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), and post-trial motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs' fraud claim, were squarely based upon the applicable law and the evidence and should be affirmed. FRAUD CLAIM: 69 It is my view that the District Court correctly held that the plaintiffs' claim for fraud was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 70 To determine this issue on summary judgment requires undisputed material facts which leave the inference that a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““. . . when knowledge had by or imputed to plaintiff is such as to compel the conclusion that a prudent man would have suspected the fraud, the court may determine as a matter of law that there had been ‘discovery’.” 377 F.2d at 47 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Failure to discover all the details of a fraud does not prevent the statute from running,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.