Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

377 F.2d 460

Docket No. 22300.

Richard v. Christ

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1967.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-05-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education · Ralph Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education and Lawrence Roberts, Carolyn Eleanor Harris v. Linda Sue Gibson, Glynn County Board of Education v. Linda Sue Gibson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Theodore R. Johns, Beaumont, Tex., Charles H. Jones, Jr., New York City, W. J. Durham, Dallas, Tex., Jack Green-berg, James M. Nabrit, III, New York City, for appellants.

¶2Hardy D. Akin, J. B. Morris, Louis V. Nelson, Beaumont, Tex., for appellees.

¶3Before GEWIN, COLEMAN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The appellant, Patricia Richard, brought suit by her father and next friend, Martel Richard, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to compel the desegregation of the Hamshire-Fannett Independent School District, Jefferson County, Texas. The complaint prayed for an order requiring the total and complete desegregation of the school system. The district court entered an order approving a twelve-year desegregation plan submitted by the school board. The plaintiff appeals from that order asserting that the plan does not meet the constitutional requirements as set forth in Stell v. Savannah-Chatham County Board of Education, 333 F.2d 55 (5 Cir. 1964).

¶6While the case was pending on appeal the district court approved a freedom of choice plan which was submitted by the school district. The appellees then moved in this court to dismiss the appeal on the grounds of mootness. By order of the Court the motion was carried with the case.

¶7This Court sitting en banc considered at length the question of school desegregation in United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 372 F.2d 836 (5 Cir. 1967). In that opinion the Court set forth in detail the standards which a desegregation plan must meet in order to satisfy constitutional requirements. We therefore vacate the order of the district court and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with that opinion.

¶8Vacated and remanded.

/377/f2d/460 · .json · Public domain