Vanater v. Boles’s Empirical Analysis
377 F.2d 898 · 1967
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Jurek v. Estelle (1980), Commonwealth v. Padgett (1968)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Costello v. United States · Edwards v. United States · Root v. Cunningham · United States v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Disappointed hope or expectation of leniency — so long as it is not wrongfully induced by the government— does not justify withdrawal of a guilty plea nor afford occasion for invalidating it. [Vanater v. Boles, 377 F.2d 898 (4th Cir.1967.)]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he guilty plea was voluntary the appellant must be said to have waived the conflict of interest theory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Curry v. Burke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.