Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

377 F.3d 1162

Docket No. 03-15095.

Nelson v. Campbell

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 2004.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2004-07-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2004

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Nelson v. Campbell Commissioner Alabama Department of Corrections et al. · Silveira v. Lockyer · Nelson v. Campbell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 2004-07-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Harriet Victoria Smith, Michael K. McIntyre, Law Office of Michael McIntyre, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶2J. Clayton Crenshaw, Michael Boysie Billingsley, Alabama Atty. Gen., Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

¶3Before ANDERSON, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5Nelson filed a complaint in the district court. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We affirmed. Nelson v. Campbell, 347 F.3d 910 (11th Cir.2003). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, 540 U.S. 1046, 124 S.Ct. 835, 157 L.Ed.2d 692 (2003). Later, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. 541 U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2117, 158 L.Ed.2d 924 (2004).

¶6*1163Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶7REVERSED and REMANDED.

/377/f3d/1162 · .json · Public domain