United States ex rel. Lissack v. Sakura Global Capital Markets, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
377 F.3d 145 · 2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2023
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens · United States v. Bornstein · Cook County v. United States Ex Rel. Chandler · United States v. Kitsap Physicians Service · United States v. Rivera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the United States Government or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval; (2) knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a false or fraudulent claim paid or approved by the Government; (3) conspires to defraud the Government by getting a' false or fraudulent claim allowed or paid;”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress enacted the [FCA] in 1863 `with the principal goal of stopping the massive frauds perpetrated by large private contractors during the Civil War.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“creates FCA liability for false statements designed to conceal, reduce, or avoid an obligation to pay money or property to the Government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.