Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 F.3d 678 - Zaidi v. Ashcroft

Zaidi v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

377 F.3d 678 · 2004

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
October 2010
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Tarrawally v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General under [§ 1158(a)(2)].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We now join our sister circuits in holding that the `no court shall have jurisdiction to review' language of § 1158(a)(3) is sufficiently specific to show that Congress intended to preclude judicial review of agency action under § 1158(a)(2).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[W]hen the IJ does not believe the applicant or does not know what to believe, the applicant's failure to corroborate his testimony can be fatal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.