Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 F.3d 809 - United States v. Dishman

United States v. Dishman’s Empirical Analysis

377 F.3d 809 · 2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · United States v. Bieri · United States v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence seized by state officers in conformity with the Fourth Amendment will not be suppressed in a federal prosecution simply because the underlying search warrant failed to conform to state law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.