Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 F.3d 879 - Tolen v. Ashcroft

Tolen v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

377 F.3d 879 · 2004

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Rodgers v. U.S. Bank, N.A. (2005), Shanklin v. Fitzgerald (2005)

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

220200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Jaurequi v. Carter Manufacturing Co. · Mayer v. Nextel West Corp. · April M. Clark v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the presumption raised by the prima facie case disappears, and the burden shifts back to [Shanklin] to show that the articulated reason was a pretext for discrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an amended complaint supercedes an original complaint and renders the original complaint without legal effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “similarly situated employees outside the protected class were treated differently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.