Settenda v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
377 F.3d 89 · 2004
Citation profile
43 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Nikijuluw v. Gonzales (2005), Romilus v. Ashcroft (2004)
43 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229C (§ 240b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Laeila Nelson Stephanie Nelson Phil Nelson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if the petitioner's evidence would compel a reasonable factfinder to conclude that relief was warranted.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“administrative findings of fact are conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sharari v. Gonzáles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.