Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 F.3d 9 - Asaba v. Ashcroft

Asaba v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

377 F.3d 9 · 2004

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · LOZADA · Reyes v. Ashcroft · Zhang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Fesseha v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he BIA acts within its discretion in denying motions to reopen that fail to meet the Lozada requirements as long as it does so in a non-arbitrary manner.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]nsofar as the respondent seeks remand on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel, we find that he has failed to comply with the procedural requirements set forth in [ Lozada ].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “upon a motion to reopen filed within 180 days after the date of the order of removal if the alien demonstrates that the failure to appear was because of exceptional circumstances.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.