377 F. Supp. 2d 158 - Threadgill v. Spellings’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When one with a discriminatory animus participates in the decision making process together with others, the court cannot say conclusively that those others were completely insulated from [ ]his influence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“To survive a summary judgment motion, [Plaintiffs] need only produce "more than a 'mere existence of a scintilla of evidence' in support of its position,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. Spencer“jury could reasonably find for the non-moving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phillips v. Spencer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.