377 F. Supp. 2d 361 - Mitchell v. Home’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Heck v. Humphrey · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · West v. Atkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“accrues when the plaintiff learns or should have learned that the evidence was fabricated and such conduct causes the claimant some injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McDonough v. Smith“[t]he Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause protects citizens against only federal government actors, not State officials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dowd v. DeMarco
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.