Gant v. Raines’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1980
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Okla. Crim. 275 - Dunbar v. State · 93 Okla. Crim. 7 - Bisanar v. State · 83 Okla. Crim. 245 - Workman v. State · Hill v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where verdict is irregular in form, but is not objected to at time it is returned, and court given opportunity to have jury correct it, every intendment will be indulged to uphold it, and where from examination of verdict and entire record, intent of jury as expressed in verdict may be clearly ascertained, it will be upheld.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wesson v. State · Neely v. State““Errors to which no exceptions are taken will not be considered on' appeal unless they are jurisdictional or fundamental in character.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smithey v. State · Buntin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.