Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 So. 2d 1001 - Dibble v. Dibble

377 So. 2d 1001 - Dibble v. Dibble’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2008

14 state decisions

901979198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 297 So. 2d 861 - Jones v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RD. CO. · Home News Publishing Co. v. UM Publishing, Inc. · 371 So. 2d 696 - McNitt v. Osborne · 184 So. 2d 454 - Leeward & Hart Aero. Corp. v. South Central Airlines, Inc. · Jackson v. Gish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “rules promulgated by the supreme court which deal with the same subject matter should be construed together and in the light of each other”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n the absence of a specific definition of “entry” in either set of rules, the issue is controlled by the supreme court’s determination of the requisite for the finality of judgments, as contained in its definition of “rendition” in Fla.R.App.P. 9.020(g). In other words, what is deemed final for appellate purposes when no motion for rehearing is filed, is likewise final for the purposes of determining when the motion itself must be served. 377 So.2d at 1003 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The law is well-settled that the time within which an appeal may be taken to any court in this state `shall be prescribed by rule of the supreme court,' and the `failure to invoke the jurisdiction of any such court within the time prescribed by such rules shall divest such court of jurisdiction to review such cause.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.