Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

377 So. 2d 251

Jacobs v. Jacobs

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1979

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1979-12-04

Relies on 334 So. 2d 13 - Shaw v. Shaw · 346 So. 2d 56 - Herzog v. Herzog

Decided 1979-12-04

PER CURIAM.

¶1We disagree with the wife’s contention that the lower court erred in awarding her rehabilitative, rather than permanent ali*CCCXXXIImony.1 Under the circumstances demonstrated in the record, that determination was a proper exercise of the discretion of the trial judge, with which we may not interfere. Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

¶2Since the appellant’s other point also lacks merit, the judgment below is

¶3Affirmed.

¶4. We note that the judgment, which provided for two years of rehabilitative alimony at $750 per month, is, upon a proper showing, subject to modification under Sec. 61.14, Fla.Stat. (1977).

/377/so2d/251 · .json · Public domain