377 So. 2d 344 - State v. Charles’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2009
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Remmer v. United States · State v. Marchand · 347 So. 2d 498 - State v. Abney · 343 So. 2d 1004 - State v. Durr · 371 So. 2d 1151 - State v. Wisham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a criminal case, any private communication, contact or tampering directly or indirectly with a juror during a trial about the matter pending before the jury is deemed presumptively prejudicial. [citations omitted]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“to determine the nature of the threats to the jury, which jurors were threatened and whether the entire jury knew of the threats.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“No juror .. is competent ... to give evidence to explain, qualify or impeach ... any verdict ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.