377 So. 2d 682 - Scullock v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roth v. United States · Barrett v. United States · 262 So. 2d 881 - Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Powell · 346 So. 2d 538 - State v. Dye · 343 So. 2d 9 - State v. Bales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding... .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]here is a presumption of constitutionality inherent in any statutory analysis.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nichols · State v. Barnes“The appellant, while armed or having the immediate ability to be armed, threatened to shoot police officers who were present and attempting to perform a lawful arrest. By his conduct appellant proposed or threatened to inflict violent harm to the officers, indicating a willingness and having the capacity to achieve that result. We find that a person of ordinary understanding and intelligence would find this conduct to be prohibited by section 843.01.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kirkland v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.