Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 SO2D 72 - State v. Turnbull

State v. Turnbull’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Richardson (1983), 446 So. 2d 280 - State v. Ossey (1984)

27 state decisions

16019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 372 So. 2d 1202 - State v. Cook · 337 So. 2d 192 - State v. McCoy · State v. Miller · State v. Hatter · 312 So. 2d 278 - State v. Beard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “error patent on the face of the record and therefore reviewable on appeal despite absence of an objection during trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “failure to obtain the accused's signature on a written Miranda waiver does not mandate a determination of involuntariness in deciding whether a confession or inculpatory statement is admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “only distinction between aggravated and forcible rape is the degree of force employed and the extent to which the victim resists.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.