Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 SO2D 810 - Rodin v. Auto-Train Corp.

Rodin v. Auto-Train Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gates v. Stucco Corp. · Majestic II, Enterprises, Inc. v. Butler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Actions against domestic corporations shall be brought only in the county where such corporation has, or usually keeps, an office for transaction of its customary business, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. Actions against foreign corporations doing business in this state shall be brought in a county where such corporation has an agent or other representative, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.