Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 377 SW2D 839 - State v. Sullivan

State v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 3306 (Federal Unemployment Tax Act)

Relies on Scofield v. Tinnin · Bennett v. Banks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Here the laborers were not employees of the owner or tenant. The employer owned no land. The work done was not incidental to farming; it was the sole occupation of the Appellee. His work was a prelude to farming and ranching. The taxpayer was engaged in the improvement, but not in the farming, of land. He neither sowed nor reaped. His compensation came from the United States; his work was in conformity with the requirements of the Government. We, therefore, think that his enterprise was commercial and not agricultural as the latter term is above defined. 171 F.2d at 229 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.