Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.2d 134 - United States v. Franchi Bros. Construction Corp.

United States v. Franchi Bros. Construction Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.2d 134 · 1967

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2010

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

60196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on R. P. Farnsworth & Co. v. Electrical Supply Co. · St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States of America for the Use of Dakota Electric Supply Company, Anorth Dakota Corporation · Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman, His Wife v. R. Philip Smith · Helvering v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. · Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) The payment is applied as the debt- or intends and so manifests to the creditor before or at the time of the payment. (ii) If the debtor fails so to indicate, the payment is applied as the creditor, within a reasonable time, determines. (iii) If neither the debtor nor the creditor seasonably so indicates, the payment is applied as a just regard to its effect upon the debtor, the creditor, and third persons makes it desirable that it should be applied. This usually results in its application to the oldest unsecured account. (iv) If the debtor is under a duty to a third person to devote funds paid by him to the discharge of a particular debt, the payment must be so applied if the creditor knows or has reason to know of that duty. This is so despite the debtor’s contrary direction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.