Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 378 F.2d 268 - Torino v. Texaco, Inc.

Torino v. Texaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

378 F.2d 268 · 1967

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
December 1982
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1982

13 federal appellate ·

60196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Lynn v. American Barge Line Co. · 144 F. Supp. 883 - Dinsel v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Link, the Supreme Court stated that the `inherent power' of a court to sua sponte dismiss a case for want of prosecution had not been disturbed by Federal Civil Procedure Rule 41(b), and held that the dismissal did not constitute an abuse of discretion especially when all the circumstances of the case were considered. Here, as in Link, there were numerous instances of delays; and the district court stated that it relied upon all of them in dismissing. Considering the totality of circumstances as they existed before the district court, we cannot conclude that the district court abused its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.